![]() ![]() The choice should depend on what you need it for rather than what it can do, but the latter is a good starting point to understand how these tools can serve your needs. In this article, let's explore both products and see which one might be more suitable for your own PDF workloads. That was the beginning of PDFelement's popularity over the years. You could finally access an affordable tool that wasn't just a PDF reader. The much younger PDFelement, on the other hand, was born with robust reading, viewing, as well as editing capabilities, which was the main difference. Other functions, such as annotations, form-filling, and electronic signatures, were added over time, but the product still remains free. However, it still remains a very basic, albeit powerful, PDF reading tool. Over the years, Adobe Reader has made leaps and bounds in terms of functionality and user experience. Since then, it has been distributed as a free utility. It was also not free at first, but the IRS bought the distribution rights so anyone could get it free that way. However, since PDF was already gaining popularity on other platforms, it was eventually released as a cross-platform PDF reading utility. Macintosh gave it the ideal platform, so it was the natural choice for a first release. ![]() The reason behind this particular release cadence was that Mac was a far more powerful operating system, and the original Adobe Reader was a resource-hungry puppy just starving for CPU power. Interestingly, it was first released for Mac, then DOS, and finally, Windows. Adobe Reader, in its many forms, is the free PDF reader developed by Adobe Systems way back in 1993. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |